Saturday, 21 May 2016

AS REUBEN ABATI TALKS ABOUT DEREGULATION, DOES HE REPRESENT THE ELITE?


The former media spokesman for President Jonathan has today given the nation his latest take on what can be called the fuel subsidy conundrum. He was quite persuasive and some of his observations are actually unassailable. However he didn't cover or perhaps is incapable of covering some of the grounds that need be covered if we are to move forward. I intend to fill in some of the blank spaces.
The petrol pump price subsidy moving from about 1.5% to say 3.5% of GDP did not become unsustainable at that transition in late 2011.  It has ALWAYS been unsustainable. The quantum of resources involved were and are of the same order of magnitude as the Federal budget itself. Yes, that is what no sane person should allow. But strangely we did. Nigeria was rushing willy-nilly towards the very edge of a fiscal cliff unperturbed, even with a cheerful song on our lips.
Now to the elite: The elite know that Nigeria is actually an undeveloped country, valiantly maintaining the pretensions of being a developing economy, which we are not. I have in the past written on the way forward for the automobile industry. I had posited that most Nigerians have no business driving any car bigger than a petrol sipping Kia Picanto. The jeep-loving crowd came after me. They buy their fuel guzzling "tokunboh" jeeps, while we pay for their fuel! Of course they like the statusquo. So also did the Association of Customs Clearing and Forwarding  Agents.
One main problem is that people like Reuben Abati, who obviously have a limitation in dealing with numbers, publicly took a position opposing removal of fuel subsidy. Then as slow students, they learn more, a luxury that Nigeria can ill afford. Two things then happen. Either, because of peer pressure or new socio-political alignments they come out to extol what they have previously opposed, WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY NEW FACTS.. . Or they keep their Road-to-Damascus conversion to themselves, hoping that the past has been put where it belongs and fully forgotten, and that nobody takes them to task. Since Reuben hit the media with a vengeance, (Abimbola Adelakun of The Punch would say in search of a new relevance), he obviously could not resist staking a position. His enemies dutifully outed him.
As for the position taken in 2011 by the leading lights of the ACN/APC, compared with their new position, it is strictly a matter of morality that has been in very short supply in our polity. What can we say, except to condemn it. Their earlier posture of urging on President Jonathan and then abandoning him midstream, can perhaps best be described by the Igbo aphorism, sending forth somebody with a head load of salt while sending a rainmaker after him. Despicable to say the least.
Meanwhile the word palliative has established a new place in our lexicon. Let's pursue that line for a while. We are supposed to speak no ill of the dead, a concept that I find difficult to agree with. Such a notion is why our brief history as a nation is full of misery and several missteps, both political and economic and an inexplicable preponderance of heroes. Our children must be so confused.
Yes, Gbolahan Mudashiru, erstwhile governor of Lagos State is long dead, and so we will leave him to his rest. However we, the elite, must have something to say to General Buhari under whose watch as military head of state that the original Chief Lateef Jakande government initiated Lagos Metroline was stopped. It was eventually to be cancelled and ultimately paid for with no goods delivered, courtesy of the European arbitrators. Has President Buhari learnt any lessons from that terrible decision? If so he would have alluded to it even briefly during his campaign. It is possible that Buhari is incapable of expressing such fine sentiments. That is part of his baggage.
On the other hand, what does one say about the new darling of the APC, former president Olusegun Obasanjo, who spent a good part of his 8year rule undermining Gov Tinubu's effort to provide Lagosians with a viable metro line system meant to be a backbone of the much awaited urban/suburban mass transit system of Greater Lagos? The point I am making here is that the elite in their overpriced airconditioned jeeps, (aided by subsidised fuel), seem incapable of thinking outside what they perceive to be their immediate needs and concerns. How wrong they are. My wife once related how she rode in the same railway carriage just a couple of feet away from the Malaysian prime minister. He was simply going to work. The only privilege extended to him was that people did not crowd around him. Of course a couple of his personal security detail was unobtrusively in th‎e vicinity, with no fuss. They asked nobody to move.
Against this background, I can now confess that one of the most stupid investments I ever made was to ‎purchase a car for my wife, for the only purpose of going to work on The Marina, Lagos. However, I had no choice. At several points over a decade, I had to throw in a driver, who invariably had a mind of his own. Driving around in the "kabu-kabu" mode was just one of their many shenanigans. The palliative of a cheap, conformable and reliable mass transit system is one that the elite, who waste time discussing the price of petrol, should have been relentlessly hammering on. It should have predated this unfruitful debate.
Because of the strong and unwavering position that I have held in support of the removal of fuel subsidy, I tried at a time to keep a list of all the turncoats. It was a useless exercise. The stampede was unbelievable. The list became so long that I gave up the project. The conclusion here is that Reuben, who has delivered very sound arguments and a good historical excursion over this matter, is definitely not alone. As the Americans say, the elite, if only they can eschew greed are the only ones who should step up to the plate and make their analytical bent to count. This is a duty.
Now, what exactly do we have here? Is it an increase in the pump price of petrol? Is it a deregulation of the downstream petroleum sector? Is it a partial deregulation? What about price modulation? What exactly does each one mean? Right now the conflicting signals coming from the various arms of government can confound the bravest of souls.
Why on earth is the PPPRA, which rightly should have been scrapped in the same press release by the minister, still making pronouncements about petrol pricing? When the government announced glibly that anyone can now import petrol into Nigeria, does it not amount to beer parlour talk? The stranglehold of the government through the NNPC over this nation is but one aspect of its maintenance of THE COMMANDING HEIGHTS OF THE NIGERIAN ECONOMY, in place over the past four and a half decade. For that era to be truly over, the National Assembly  must be involved in tearing down the walls. At the end of the day the NNPC, if it survives at all, will have no business with the downstream sector of the petroleum industry.
If the NNPC owns any refinery, it should be expected to sink or swim. The government must start by relieving NNPC of any role in the importation of ANY fuel into Nigeria, and sell off all its fuel dumps nationwide starting with The Atlas Cove, which for the past two decades has remained a load on the conscience of those who still have one.
I have said my bit.

Monday, 2 May 2016

Change Management: Deformed objectives, leadership disharmony and crises of expectations Ik Muo, PhD.

Guest feature:

Ik Muo, PhD. FCIB.(muoigbo@yahoo.com) Department of Business Administration, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State.  Published,(abridged) in the Guardian of 25/7/15, p54;

About 500 years ago, Machiavelli declared authoritatively that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle than to initiate a new order of things.’ (Nicholo’ Machiavelli,(1532)The Prince: A handbook of power, politics and statesmanship). As it was then, so it is now. Change; whether imposed or voluntary, is not a tea party, it is a serious business and the failure rate of change efforts averages above 70%. Those who are genuinely interested in making a success of change-and the transition, which is the core issue-, therefore make conscious efforts to create the conditions that are favourable for success or avoid those that have the capabilities to torpedo the effort. Some of these critical success factors (or hindrances in reverse) are objectives, leadership and the expectation dynamics.
It has been said that ‘the first step to getting the things you want out of life is to decide what you want’. As it is for life, so it is for the slippery process of change. The importance of change objectives is that they determine the strategies adopted as well as providing a means of assessing performance. Many change programmes actually have objectives but at times, these objectives are shortsighted or self-serving, non-inclusive, or are ‘kurukere’ and contain some hidden agenda. Consequently, they adopt strategies that may not last the distance or are out-rightly Machiavellian. These change operatives have forgotten that ‘to be prepared is half of the victory’ (Miguel de Cervantes), and that getting the objectives and strategies right is the key preparation factor.
Leadership is obviously a critical factor in the success or failure of change management.  A key dimension in this leadership factor is

REUBEN ABATI CANNOT DECRY THE EXCESSES OF THE FULANI HERDSMEN WITHOUT INSULTING NDIGBO


dailypostng article by ruben abati

Reuben Abati wrote:

"Ethnic hate, serving as sub-text to the January 1966 and July 1966 coups, for example, set the stage for the civil war of 1967 -70. The root of Igbo-Hausa/Fulani acrimony can be traced back to that season when Igbos were slaughtered in the North, and (wait for this) . .

1)THE HAUSA/FULANI WERE SLAUGHTERED IN THE EAST  . .

Really? Please Reuben tell me about it! 

This is a rather strange way of providing balance in a narrative by throwing in a few chunks of falsehood as ganishing? Reuben Abati had earlier been confronted and rubbished by better organised professionals like Chuks Iloegbunam, but obviously he has refused to learn any lessons.

2) He continued, "Ethnic hate also led to the Tiv riots, crisis in the Middle Belt since then, . "

"Since then. ?" Since when?

Reuben has messed up the order of events in history. The Tiv riots against the Hausa - Fulani hegemony in the north spanned a period from before Nigeria's paper independence in 1960 to just before the military coup of 1966. Hence that agitation for Tiv freedom led valiantly by Joseph Tarka of blessed memory could by no stretch have been a  diirect result of whatever "sins" Ndigbo committed (later) in January 1966 as Reuben Abati would have us believe. It is on record that Ndigbo have been hunted as game every so often since the 1950s. Just check the historical records.
Instead of sticking to profering solutions to the menace of Fulani herdsmen (and other criminals elements who have found that appellation a good cover for their illegal activities), Reuben could not resist taking another poke at Ndigbo. I find it rather strange that some people who "write for a living" would suddenly rouse themselves from their self-induced stupour to address issue that ordinary folks like me had taken on a year ago. Thank God that Mr Abati now has time on his hands.

3) Reuben dutifully  warned that if the situation is not urgently addressed, "A resort to self-help SUCH AS OCCURRED IN 1966, could have serious national security implications. . " . Here we go again.
Self-help? It is most amazing that a government organised, approved and tolerated genocide of Ndigbo in 1966/67 could be presented by an otherwise educated Nigerian, who had the priveledge of serving (himself?) in the highest levels of government, to have been as result of self-help by the aggrieved. Even General Gowon cannot say this. He would rather keep mum or accuse the Ikemba of another infraction long fogotten. This is probably part of the reasons Gowon has adamantly refused to write his memoirs.  At this rate, Nigeria has absolutely no hope going forward.

Meanwhile I will concede that Mr Abati's excessively long opinion piece is not completely bereft of redeeming features. Shorn of the Igbophobic overindulgence,  it should serve as another wake-up call to Nigerians and the sleepwalking government at Abuja. His belated commentary was an inelegant rehash of earlier writers.

FOR LEADING A GOVERNMENT OF LIMITED OBJECTIVES: MASARI HAILS PRESIDENT BUHARI


Katsina State governor, Aminu Bello Masari has been reported in the media to have said that northern Nigeria would have been in misery had former President Goodluck Jonathan won the 2015 presidential election.
Speaking at the 33rd annual symposium in memory of late Malam Aminu Kano, Governor Masari described the situation the north found itself as precarious in which the region fell short in every aspect of human development. If the governor had been following the annual UNDP report on Human Development, he would have noted that the indices for the north have been dismal at best over at least three decades. No northern dominated federal administration has yet been able to reverse that trend. Most Nigerians will  easily agree that that is one of the reasons why Buhari was elected into office.
On the comment by Governor Masari that the lives of the people of northern Nigeria have been rendered valueless by the Boko Haram insurgency, it is clearly up to the citizens in the north to decide to change that narrative.
He maintained that the emergence of Muhammadu Buhari as Nigeria’s president brought a glimmer of hope to the north and anticipation of the return of socio-economic prosperity.
With Buhari now in power, are we then to understand that the north is

BUHARI STILL SAYS NO TO NAIRA DEVALUATION.

President Muhammadu Buhari reportedly insisted on Friday in Abuja that he was YET to be convinced that the vast majority of ordinary Nigerians will derive any tangible benefit from a devaluation of the Naira. He is definitely entitled to his misgivings.  
Without immediately weighing in on one side or the other of the devaluation debate, I must point out that the main issue highlighted above is the the speed at which Buhari can learn. I have deliberately laid emphasis on the word YET. . Pray, what does one expect of a 72(?)year old who has probably never read any complex document since he was dethroned by his military colleagues some 35 years ago? If indeed devaluation is it, I doubt if President Buhari can get it. I believe that it is as bad as that.
Buhari has for the past three years and more been surrounded by his political friends who, for reasons best known to them, insist on not upsetting him with contrary viewpoints. It is now time to bring on board perceived enemies, opponents and iconoclasts, people who do not care to respect whatever preconceived notions Buhari brought along to Aso Rock. The system, if indeed there is one, needs to be torn down and rebuilt from the ground up, brick by brick. Even if for nuisance value, though most unlikely, people like economist Henry Boyo and many others must have a role. This job is currently beyond President Buhari and his present team. Someone wrote a few weeks ago that Buhari needs help. Need I say more?

Buhari to sack five ministers? Where does that lead us?


Writings in Naij.com, correspondent Clement Ejiofor reported that five ministers in President Buhari's cabinet may have been pencilled down for sacking. He elaborated. I have wondered if this is news or a figment of the imagination of the writer as in wishful thinking. Are we happy with their performance to date? Definitely not. However floating the kite of a cabinet reshuffle now is definitely unhelpful. Let those who got the jobs settle down and do it.
Dr Kayode Fayemi "was reported to have said that he would need time to learn in his ministry."
This is correct. It applies to almost everyone of the ministers even potential high fliers like Babatunde Raji Fashola. The size, scope and the entrenched interests in just one of the ministries under Fashola, say Power or Works, is capable of styming the most brilliant of us all. When a president or minister says that he/she will hit the ground running, nobody seems to factor in the fact that he/she will have to run the gauntlet set up by the necessary evil called the Civil Service. The 2016 Budget fiasco is a case in point.
Dr Ibe Emmanuel Kachikwu of Petroleum and NNPC was not mentioned in this regard. However I am dragging his name and position into this discussion because in the coming year or so we shall definitely encounter several developments that we, the masses, will be extremely unhappy about. Take the current fuel and electricity scarcity for example. We had it coming due to years of timidity, spineless administration and non-regulation. The government seems incapable (or is it unwilling?) to explain, sell or push through with the new electricity tariff. Everybody prefers to discuss metres. I do not envy Kachikwu. Yes, he sells gas to the power companies, and has no fuel for the masses.
As regards the new Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama, when is he ever going to